
Aubrey
|
um not at all.:
1) why should we punish the child, it was NOT the child's fault it was born
2) With sex comes responsibilities, and if you're going to engage, you BETTER be willing to pay (whether it means adoption, giving up your life for theirs, what ever the consequence is- you better be ready.)
3) From the moment of conception it has its own DNA coding, therefore it's tech. not the "women's body", the only thing the women is doing is housing and feeding it.
4) The two participating had the choice whether or not they were ready to deal with the consequences so why give them more choices if they're already making bad ones?
5) rape, I sympathise greatly, but why punish the child? it's not the child's fault, yes it is a HUGE burden and COSNTANT reminder, but still- from a political perspective it's all or nothing, if it were up to me those who were raped (politically) would have the choice (religion in there there would be no rape or abortion- but that's not life). If I were raped though I would definately keep the child though. But in politics it's all or nothing.
6) There is ALWAYS adoption- if you're willing to kill a child, why are you worried about its life in an adoption agency???
7) We are not God, we do not have the right to say who lives and who dies.
8) From the moment of conception it IS alive.(to be alive it has to fill 4 criterias, (1) metabolism, (2) growth, (3) reaction to stimuli, and (4) reproduction)
9) It's either pro-life or pro-death, not pro-choice because where is that child's choice? and the oppisite of life is death and that's what they are saying is good- the right to put a child to death- YAY!!! hah not! |

earlthek
 |
NO!! No matter how you slice it, it's murder. Those that proceed with an abortion are taking a human life, even though the child may be unborn. It is breathing, it has blood flowing through its veins, it can feel pain, it can feel happiness. Anyone that could even think of taking that chance at life away from the unborn is a killer, in my book!! |