idontkno
|
nuk. |
|
G®een Archer ♫
 |
for me, cleanest and cheapest would be solar. |
|
Bill
 |
Wind power if you don't mind a few dead birds. |
|
FreddyBoy1
|
There are ionizing smokestack scrubbers now that give zero emissions at the stack, so I would say cogeneration with a bio-mass boiler and steam generated electricity. You make heat, plus electricity, plus reduce your garbage bill! |
|
Reticent
 |
There are really 3 answers to your question; solar, wind, and the wave motion of the sea can be used to produce clean, cheap energy. All 3 have been used on a limited basis, but man has not used any of them productively. |
|
philbertpheinstein
|
Solar cells. Once paid for they last a lifetime. No pollution at all after manufacture. |
|
sweetcelestial07
 |
If we can find the right catalyst, water!! We just need to find a cheap way to break the water molecules apart to get the energy harnessed inside. |
|
crom
|
Electricity is clean and cheap (it can be generated by force). Though it's little dangerous. |
|
Morrisevers
 |
Helium fusion. It will be possible to make these nuclear devices the size of a hard drive and produce as much energy as the shuttle rocket engines! Get ready for the Jetson's flying car to come alive! But you have to give it some time, it's still under development. |
|
xpainillusionx
 |
i agree with bill. definitely the wind |
|
helliviknow
|
The cleanest are solar and wind I think. however these are somewhat expensive for energy produced.
Water engergy is good and clean too and somewhat more cost effective.
I'm not sure what would be cheapest right now, but I would guess nuclear. |
|
J_shizzle
|
I believe that nuclear fusion is the energy of the future. It has been achieved, but not harnessed for electricity yet.
Nuclear fusion is basically works the same as the sun, and its been buning for billions of years! |
|
| |
|
Homepage 
Financial
Forum 
Business & Finance 
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
