thrasher6900
|
Dark and Sexy. They go hand and hand what else can i say |
|
Roller Coaster Know It All
 |
tan a little but not too much |
|
zaxton6
 |
i think it looks better to have a tan but is healther not to tan as it can cause skin cancer. |
|
mad dog
|
tan because you don't want someone that is light |
|
marhalie_elsdragon
|
I like people to have their natural skin-tone, period. Purposely tanning seems pretty stupid to me. It's not that I don't like people with darker skin; if you're born with it, chances are you'll look good in it, but baking yourself will only make you look older faster in the long run. |
|
philbertpheinstein
 |
I could look at tan lines all day. |
|
curiousd
 |
Tanned. Just not overly tanned. Then it just looks leathery.
Way back when common laborers that had to work outside were well tanned so having very white skin like the upper class that didn't have to work was considered attractive.
Now, the elite are the ones that sport tans from their yachts, long vacations, etc.
Thanks why during this time a tan is considered attractive. |
|
Hippie
|
In the U.S., tanned. Usually freakishly dark tanned. In the U.K., pale is more popular, better for your skin, and look at the English beauties who have awesome, pale skin. |
|
charmer
|
my preference - tanned - all the way |
|
louiechickk2008
|
not to be tanned |
|
think.pink
 |
it is attractive to be appropriatly tanned. sunburning is very unattractive and is unhealthy to you skin, while a nice tan does look really good. it is definatly not attractive to look orange-ish (from a mystic tan) or too over-tanned or completely pale. |
|
| |
|
Homepage 
Financial
Forum 
Business & Finance 
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
