What is the difference between Indian management and Japanese management?

i am a management student.i want to make a project on indian management vs japanese management.i want to know the difference between in their techniques ,skills,organizing and controlling ,organizing and motivation in global contextand management in the context of politics,international labour relation

I don't know, but I will dare say that there has to be a differece in management techniques.

p.s. thanks for the 2 points

Japan has had immense success in th Industrialized world. Its the second largest economy in the world. Companies like Toyota, Sony, Honda are multi-billion dollar companies. Japanese have an eye for quality and usually their management is comprised of old time technical people. They have a keen eye on future. E.g. labor costs in Japan are high enough, but the legacy financial burden for Toyota is $200 versus $1700-2000 for General Motors! The companies have weathered global recessions and most of all the stagnant Japanese economy through nineties.

India is a very young capitalist economy. The country for a long time tried embracing Soviet socialism. The country started to liberalize the economy in 1990's. The only private sector names which are big enough and feature in Fortune's global 500 are Tata Sons, Reliance (Ambani family) and Birlas. Of these Ambanis are the youngest and biggest empire (14 billion, I think). Tatas have been around since early 1900's, but the British Rule and later strict government regulations hampered growth.

The new age companies that are known for their amazing growth and management would be Infosys Technologies ($ 2 billion revenues), Wipro (Technologies at $2 billion), Bharti (~ 2 Billion). Its been fairly recent that many companies joined the billion dollar revenue club. The export industry which has long been prevalent in Japan, has been recognized as growth engine fairly recently.

The Indian companies management style now is based on global models. And since they have been acquiring companies abroad over the past decade, the management style changes are inevitable. But old companies were very very bureaucratic. The organizations promoted seniority and not potential and the global focus was missing.

hi siya o. i m bhupendra. i havve been through ur question. as my knowledge is i know that japanese perception of magement if nothing but the pure INNOVATION rather than indian or western perception of management that is compeletely INVNTIVE. u must have known these terms. may i clear it to u?

Well, I have heard people saying
1 Indian = 10 Japanese
becoz one Indian can handle work equivalent to 10 Japanese
& also they say:
10 Indian = 1 japanise
becoz probably, if you put 10 indians together, they tend to work equivalent to 1 japanise.

japaneese thinks that employees are machines if one wore out they replace it. Indians oil them then try to run again and thats why indian companies are successful in failing

Indian managers are innovators. they take risk and use they engineerring backgrounf for problem solving. Japanese are not risky. they like study growth and must have control over the company. they need to know what tomorrow will be like.

What is their management technique?

-->May be Japanese traditional unique style.. but if they graduate from MBA course, they might use its management style. But Japanese people usually receive traning of management at company but not univerisity or higher edcation so it is really depend on which company they belong to.

Are they flexible?

I think they are tolerance and accept your countries culture. so may be flexible to you.
But it really depend on person as well one is more flexible than others.. like that.

What don't they appreciate?

--->(I guess) Top down management.
Japanese company usually take bottom up management. In case of this you are expected to think by yourself what you should do and work without your boss's order sometime.

Please note it is also not easy for a Japanese worker to assume what they are really expected to do from their manager without asking. So trying to make good communication from you to your manager is important.

Most unfair-is when people end up quitting (engineers,top employees such as supervisors, not the labor force) they do no ask other employees for feedback as to what is going on, why they are losing such valuable employees. Just different from American Corporate, pro's and con's with both.

the Japanese corporate culture is based on loyalty and respect. There are protocols for everything. For instance, you don't leave the office before your boss does. You don't make your boss look bad in front of other and etc. Most Japanese manager I've worked with is very ethical. Most Japanese management technique is authoritative. Depending on the manager, he or she is flexible. They don't appreciate people that are disrespectful. Good Luck!

The Japanese corporate culture is based on loyalty and respect. There are protocols for everything. For instance, you don't leave the office before your boss does. You don't make your boss look bad in front of other and etc. Most Japanese manager I've worked with is very ethical. Most Japanese management technique is authoritative. Depending on the manager, he or she is flexible. They don't appreciate people that are disrespectful

i need a friend.....will u be?
jack_hunter_qw@yahoo.com

Enter Your Message or Comment

User Name:
User Email:
Post a comment:

Archive: Forum -Forum -Finance - Links - 1 - 2 - RSS - All RSS Feeds
The Causes and the Results. 0.054
Copyright (c) 2011 Financial Crisis Sunday, May 27, 2012 - Terms of use - Privacy Policy