Mr Sceptic
|
I didn't hear all the evidence, so my opinion on this case really isn't valid.
But it does surprise me that being stoned and pissed when looking after a small child isn't viewed as being negligent in itself.
Letting a dangerous dog into the house does seem to me like recklessness to the point of criminality. |
|
Rocko Barbella
|
HUH??? |
|
mirrorbee
|
may be they pat you on the back here in England or slap your wrists but you will have to live with what you done ,for the rest of your life, and answer to God |
|
sweetie
 |
i think you mean Dog and no it shouldn't, i don't know what the judge was thinking |
|
3dom
 |
Yes, after today it looks like you can, allow a dog that is
1. You are not surpose to have in the uk anyway and
2. Was not allowed in the house when the little girl was there.
What was she thinking, or was she that pasted it that she was not thinking at all? |
|
tikketiboo
|
pleeeassee!!.. if you get in that state dont be in charge of an animal!!.. they deserve to live with someone that can look after them! |
|
3thinker
 |
Going off the court case today then yes. |
|
angler
|
No.Even more so with new laws on drugs and driving. |
|
Tefi
 |
No, it isn't true. |
|
confused
 |
nope |
|
kate
 |
Is being in a mental institution with big guys that eat kids and are NOT locked up ,
Is that getting away with it ?
> |
|
Fluffy
|
Well you might have a case of manslaugher but I hardly think that classes as 'getting away with it'. |
|
wonderingstar
|
looks that way......
all illegal & yet nothing, wheres the justice. |
|
Ylang-Ylang
 |
You would still be guilty, but would probably serve your sentence in Ramsden. |
|
UK Action Man
|
Yeah..... but not if you hint to everyone on Yahoo answers what youre gonna do........
hehe |
|
ska120610
|
do you plan on killing another human????? well i would not do that |
|
michael
 |
absolutely.
cheers! |
|
| |
|
Homepage 
Financial
Forum 
Insurance 
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
