burnemwill
 |
totally depends on how important that $1000 is to you, how much risk you are willing to take, and how much liquidity you need (access in case of emergency). I personally recommend investing in oil right now, but of course that is an obvious choice, but to avoid the stock market and be safe with your money look into CDs (certificat of deposit) you can get an Annual percentage yield(APY) near 6.5% if you look. And that is good compared to the average stock yeild of just less than 8% without the risk. Also, for stock investing here is a website that has the most important calculation to make sure that the money you get out in the long run is more than money obtained in another avenue.
I use this calculation for every investment I make.
http://www.valuepro.net/approach/wacc/wacc.shtml |
|
Fletcher
|
I'd save it. Cause 1000 dollars isn't enough to get any real money back. |
|
flguy48tc
|
i would invest in a real estate fund. you can`t go wrong with real estate.i got a real estate fund,its the best thing i ever done. |
|
Jaylaw
|
Banking stock, its long term but stable |
|
jojo
|
Many people have advice about which stock to invest in. But you should only listen to someone who has proven that they can pick stocks that outperform the stock market. That is the idea behind the site http://www.top10traders.com - this is a free site where you can see what the best traders are investing in. The site lets you create your own portfolio with $100,000 in "play" money. Then at the end of each month the site ranks all the portfolios, and lists out the best ones on its main page.
If you want to invest,go through the portfolios of the best traders and find a stock that you recognize, and whose products you use and like. |
|
Chris
|
Stock Symbol SGMO-They have a cure for HIV, they research the genes of the few people who can mysteriously not get sick from diseases, and apply new technologies. |
|
big brotha
 |
working tools man, later you can sell 'em again if they not broken |
|
Adam J
|
Well at the moment my choice would be a company called Aspreva (ASPV) (note that I accept no responsibility for the real world results of investing in this company)...
If you actually have $1000 to invest, I suggest opening an account with an online broker (note, look for one that doesn't charge account fees on small accounts, I think I saw a commercial where TD waterhouse or ameritrade claimed they didn't, but could be wrong) and invest the money in an S&P 500 exchange traded fund (spy and i v v being two examples). I don't recommend investing in individual stocks unless you have the time to research them thoroughly. |
|
humanresourcesman
|
It depends on how important it is for you to keep your thousand dollars. If you want to gamble with it I would buy king.pk trading at 8.2 cents as of last Friday. see http://www.kingresources.net If you want a good mutual fund I recommend a Vanguard Midcap fund see http://www.vanguard.com Whatever you do don't risk money you cannot afford to lose. |
|
tonalc1
 |
If I had no conscience, Halliburton. |
|
rich p
|
None, those bastard's (Wall Street) have way more money than they should already. That $1000 that you or anyone else invest in a stock could be a move toward's eliminating your job or another US citizen's. The stock market is the most corrupt (government backed) scam going, next to the insurance industry. |
|
Enlightened
|
Banking sector or in Oil and Gas sector.....Investing in forex is also good choice |
|
michaelpaul7747
|
Google
Time Warner |
|
Ellan M
|
I would save a little more before i start thinking about investing it. |
|
Nunoyvgvna Awi
|
well I would never buy one stock.....simple theory to follow....never put all your eggs in one basket.
I would buy some shares of a few companies if not look into bonds and cd's. And even an IRA account.
Even a 18 month CD might produce more yeild on your $1000 than stock market would as you will have trading fee's with stocks. |
|
Frank Castle
|
Merck.
50% of every women between 9 and 26 will be their customers eventually. (The other 50% will go to GlaxoSmithKline)
NOTE: We now have a cervical cancer vaccine.
GlaxoSmithKline filed the application for approval on March 2006 in Europe and they are still waiting. |
|
| |
|
Homepage 
Financial
Forum 
Investing 
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
