Anime Girl
 |
The bailout is not a legal question. The Supreme Court only makes decisions on court cases that involve the constitution of the united states - which has nothing to do with the bailout.
http://directory.stocksbuyorsell.com/search.php?q=stocks |
|
Remkade
 |
It must be challenged in court, then make it all the way up to the Supreme Court before they can provide a ruling on it. Its possible that it might happen, but highly unlikely. Also, the soonest it would occur is probably sometime next year as the court system isn't exactly that fast. |
|
Jack B
|
Because nothing has been submitted to them , that's why . |
|
src50
|
They have to wait for someone to sue. |
|
Happy Enzyme
|
That is not what the Supreme Court is set up for. If someone files a law suit against the bail-out it might go before the court, but no one will. |
|
virginia_maryland
|
duh, someone has to take it there first. |
|
Maczenzie
|
The supreme court has no authority over the bailout plan. They only rule on legislation that goes through the court system. |
|
moviebuff
 |
It;s a free society, if anyone could overrule what Congress has passed it would not be a democracy anymore. |
|
trer
|
Because it's in their best interests for the bailout to happen. They have investments with the big banks and financial institutions. |
|
chicagodude420
|
They only jump in to go against the people not to help the people. They also only put their nose in when it's to forward aliberal agenda |
|
v b
|
On what grounds would you take it to the court? |
|
sunflowers
 |
You forget they helped get Bush into office. |
|
HATE 2 PAY
|
they would be doing what the people want them to do , and they cannot do that |
|
| |
|
Homepage 
Financial
Forum 
Investing 
No Spam
Adult 
Gambling
Unfinished
Deception
Plagiarism
Not English
