
katie s
 |
efficiant organization because you can hire an accountant or buy a calculator. |
|

Jim E
|
If you fail to have one of these the chances are your business will fail anyway. |
|

Larry Snider
|
don't they 2 go hand in hand |
|

Nazni84
|
Both but efficient organization more as it includes accurate mathmatics. |
|

tracirinagreg
 |
combination between the two |
|

anand harsha from jodhpur
|
an efficient organization with accurate mathematics with good management skills. |
|

me and you today
|
Both. You need accuracy to have an efficient organization. |
|

Adam P
|
Only thing that matters is profit, so math.
If you can get the profit without organization it's all cool ...without math you'll never know if you're making a profit. |
|

Xanre
 |
I'd say that a balance of the two is really important. If your mathematics are inaccurate then you won't have an accurate report on how your business is doing. On the other hand, if you're too unorganized then the important papers are near impossible to locate when needed, and the sales information is scattered, so you still don't know how you're doing. |
|

♥blue eyes♥
 |
both well actually if you have efficient organisation then you should have accurate mathematics.
So probably effective organisation! |
|

sarabmw
|
Honestly they are both very important in running a business, but if you have your organization on top then that means you'll have a organized team handling all your stuff which means your accurate mathematics should be fine. |
|

rcesm
 |
I'd think that with efficient organization COMES accurate mathematics...
It wouldn't be very efficient unless it was accurate. |
|

SB
|
you have to have a balance of both |
|

Henry Hedgehog
 |
Neither. The important things are:
1. Keeping your customers satisfied.
2. Consistent positive cashflow.
3. Excellent gross margins.
Get these three right and your business will be a success. Get them wrong and you're dead in the water. |
|

hesperias_witch
 |
Math..I watched my brothers business and MONEY was always a problem...you know too many hands in the cookie jar |
|

| |
|