
NGC6205
|
I suggest you look it up again. Here are a few places to start.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode26/usc_sup_01_26.html
http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html
http://www.quatloos.com/
Every tax protestor in the past 90 years has lost every case where they claimed that they themselves did not have to pay income taxes. Note, the Banister "win" was because he wasn't in court about his income taxes. He was in court because of a return he completed for someone else. Banister was released, the man whose return Banister completed, was sentenced to prison. Banister has admitted many times that he pays his income taxes and files his returns. All other tax protestors have lost in court every time.
Someone has referenced some court cases as his source, you better actually read those. Those were criminal procedings and though the persons involved were found not guilty of CRIMINAL charges, they still had to pay their taxes. In fact, I'll just quote one of them here...
In U.S. v. Kuglin, CR-03-20111, near the end of the transcripts, pg. 776,
THE COURT: So anything else from the United States?
MR. MURPHY (Federal lawyer): Just one thing, to put Ms. Kuglin on notice, she has got to pay taxes, I think the court
ought to instruct her that that is the law. She has got to file returns and --
MR. BECRAFT (Lawyer for defense): Your Honor, that is going to be cleaned up totally.
THE COURT: Okay. Well, Mr. Murphy is not incorrect that it is the law, and I think what he's also saying is there will still be civil penalties.
MR. BECRAFT: I expect probably 90-day letters to be coming pretty quick.
THE COURT: Okay.
MR. BECRAFT: And there's going to be civil proceedings, and she is going to being take responsibility -- she is going to be doing things to respond to all of that like file returns, Your Honor.
<END QUOTE OF TRANSCRIPT>
So, if you want to foolishly follow believe Kuglin got away something, go right ahead. Please note the court said "Mr. Murphy is not incorrect that it is the law."
The other case, U.S. v. Long is similar. Long won his criminal case, but then lost his civil case and ended up paying taxes AND penalties.
So keep giving me thumbs down and believing tax protestor arguments. You will eventually get taken to court and you will lose. |

bostonianinmo
 |
Easy! Just earn less than the filing requirement amount for your filing status! For a Single taxpayer, under age 66 and not a dependent, that will be $8,750 for 2007. (But good luck surviving on that income!)
You are quite completely mistaken when you say that there is no law, however! The few fools who have tried to make that claim are in prison and are financially destitute. If that's what you want, go for it. Personally, I'll pay my taxes and keep my freedom. |