Home | Links | Contact Us | Bookmark
Financial Forum Search :
   Homepage      News      Financial Topics     Finance Directories      Financial Forum      Dictionary  
Financial Forum    Taxes
Finance Discussion Forum

 How do i claim income made uder the table?
i made some money last year that i din't get a 1099 for because it was made really under the table but i want to slaim it on my taxes do i need to get proof of that income ?...


 How much tax will I have to pay back?
During the summer I had a contract job that did not take taxes out of our paychecks. I asked a co-worker how much we'd have to file back and his reply was, "I'm just not gonna bother ...


 Do I have to have my ex husband's social security number to file my taxes?
I went to H&R block and tried to do the online tax preparation, but I can't get by without his social security number. The problem is that I have no way to get his social. I don't talk ...


 Did anyone do their taxes online through H&R Block or Turbo Tax and had direct deposit receive thier stimulus?
...


 How can save tax?
...


 Can i take lottery tickets off my taxes?
i live in TN, usa....


 Can a single person afford to live in Britain if they are 50 with no pension?
...


 What is VAT and why it is compulsory?
...


 If i have one dependant about how much can i get back if i make $20,000?
...


 My adult son has diabetes and can not work. I am supporting him completely. Can I claim him as a dependent?
...


 Previous employor withholding W-2's?
My previous employor hasn't sent my W-2's. We had several payroll companies and has all of 2006 W-2's execpt Jan-March. In that time he cut me checks out of his personal account like I ...


 What is the maximum amount you and your wife can make and still get that bonus the government gives?
I was wondering how much you could make and still qualify for that bonus the government gives out. My wife didn't really make anything this year, less than 3,000 dollars total for the year, and I...


 What is the meaning of: convent?
...


 Can I file my 2006 taxes before I receive my W4?

Additional Details
As mentioned I meant my W2s. Can I file my taxes for 2006 BEFORE I receive my W2?...


 Can a disabled relative be claimed on taxes?
My brother was born with a severe birth defect called Cloacal Bladder exstrophy. As a result he was given a surgical procedure where his ureturs from his kidneys were tied internally to his ...


 What federal tax form do I use if........?
I make less than $7,000 a year; I don't own a home or any property; I have NO children (thank God); I'm not married, and I gave money to my local church last year. Is there a special form I...


 Why do people get busted for tax evasion if there is no law that we have to pay income tax?
My understanding is that there is NO law that requires that people pay income tax and yet I hear about people getting popped all the time by the IRS for income tax evasion.

What gives?
<...


 If I was employed for a couple months with this company, do I still have include them when I file my taxes?
And what will happen if I don't include them?...


 Do you only pay taxes if you are working? if someone isn't working you still have to pay taxes? if so on what?
please give me an ...


 17 year old girl, claimed as a dependent on parent's taxes, but made $3000. Do I get the tax rebate?
My parents claimed me on their taxes as a dependent. But I worked all last year, and made over $3000, so do I qualify for the rebate? I initially thought i did, but now I have read an article that ...



capitalism4ever
Poll: Do you want the FairTax to be enacted?
The FairTax is a bill in congress that would eliminate all federal taxes and replace them all with a 23% national sales tax. A rebate is issued to everyone for the calculated amount of taxes spent on the basic necessities of life.
Additional Details
This isn't a crazy bill that will never happen. This bill has 60 cosponsors in the house of representatives.
                     
 




Kirk
Rating
Absolutely. It would be 23%, as it an inclusive tax. it would replace the imbedded taxes(aprox. 22.5%) that are now included in the price of everything we buy at the retail level. Some question if this is true, as they wonder if the elimination of the corporate taxes would actualy reduce the price by that 23%.. I am sure that a few companies will try and keep that 23% for themselves, but as soon as a well run company realizes that they would gain a huge market share by passing the savings on, all other companies in that market would be forced to do the same. with the system that we have now, sales taxes are levied in an exclisive manner.....meaning the sales tax is levied on top of the price marked on any item. With a six percent sales tax, a $1.00 item ends up costing $1.06. Under the fair tax, that same item would be still be priced at $1.00, but that price would include the 23% federal tax. Granted there would still be state sales taxes on that price, but by implementing the fair tax, your pay check would not be reduced in any way by the federal government.
Remember, there is not a single company in the U.S. that pays taxes out of their coffers. Instead they pass ALL taxes on to the consumer......this is true in all businesses. As a painting contractor, I pass my entire tax burden on to my customers, and this includes my personal income tax, and my matching share of payroll deductions for my employees as well.
Right now, the U.S. has the second highest corporate taxes in the world. This is the reason that many corporations move their headquarters over seas. They do this to keep their prices competitive. Imagine the economic boom that the U.S. would realize if we eliminated the corporate tax burden from the consumer. We would become the place in the world that corporations would want to be located.


richard t
Rating
it helps the rich......punishes the poor.........NOPE..........


heyteach
It is a real bill that would destroy America. The actual rate is 30%, they do NOT rebate your necessities--they TELL you what you SHOULD spend and then "prebate" that. For all the elderly ill on Medicare they will ALL end up on Medicaid--or dead from lack of care.

While an economist COULD design a good consumption tax, one that does NOT exclude necessities is going to hit the poorest, hardest.

There is NOTHING in the legislation proposed to stop the feds from thrusting more of their unfunded mandates on the state level. There is NOTHING to prevent a hike from the actual 30T (something that is $1 is $1.30 under the plan; they want to pretend that is 23%--creative math doesn't cut it in the real world.) It will NOT have any effect of the taxes on the price of gas, etc.
[And the 23 percent figure is itself a matter of hot dispute. In effect, what costs $1.00 now would, under the new tax, cost $1.30. How is that not a 30 percent tax? Proponents argue that the extra 30 cents is merely 23 percent of the final price of $1.30. Jewish World Review Dec. 18, 2007 / 9 Teves 5768
Huckabee vs. taxes: No match
By Clarence Page ]


So what you get is at minimum a 20% increase (after prebates) in the cost of food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and your utility bills. What a GIFT for the working poor!

Just as Satan's AMT tax was created in the '70s to SUPPOSEDLY tax about 150 folks who were able to avoid taxes and NOW ensnares tens or hundreds of thousands of middle-class taxpayers, EVERY attempt at class warfare will ALWAYS hurt the working poor the hardest. The rich will NOT end up paying this--there ARE ways around it for them.


winters in buffalo
Rating
Yes, and No.

Compared to our current system, I'd certainly prefer the Fair Tax.

However, I'd much rather have a Flat Tax.

The Fair Tax is a great idea.. in theory. It makes total sense on paper, but I think it lacks a certain degree of stability. A large enough group of people could hold a mass boycott in an attempt to cut off tax revenue to the government, and in turn have the whole system spiral out of control.


special k
YES!!
Everybody needs to read the Fair Tax book, before you make an opinion. I wonder how many negative posters have actually done their research. It just seems like common sense to me. Too many benefits to post-read the book.


slapdawg
Rating
Yes, and the sooner the better. I come out good on this, so I must be one of the 'rich' ones.

I'm, single, self-employed, have no house and I gross about $15K a year (hey, what can I say? I'm a musician :-). I did the FairTax calculator, and my true purchasing power with the current system is about $10,688, after taxes. Under the Fair Tax system, it would be about $12,053. So, with the Fair Tax, I would get: 12.76% MORE spendable income. $1,364.66 MORE purchasing power, and $1,537.96 LESS federal taxes! My effective tax rate would fall from almost 19.66% to 9.41%.

I'm not getting how the poor are hit so hard with this, unless those who argue that it does consider me part of the "wealthy" class. Hmmmm... something tells me those opposed to this have a vested interest in keeping things the way they are. My guess is those who are saying no are H&R block employees, accountants, special interest lobbyists and those interested in creating a socialist state.

The intellectually honest are not opposed to this. Even the NRF is coming around to the idea that this makes sound economic sense, and would be a huge boon for retailers.


Wayne Z
Rating
No.

It wouldn't for multiple reasons discussed on this and many other message boards.

Yes....and it is a 30% tax.....not 23%.

Edit-

They get the 23% by taking the tax divided by the total price not the pre-tax price. For example:

$1000 Cost of Item A
$ 300 "Fair"tax
$1300 Final Cost

If you take the tax divided by the final cost you get just over 23% ($300 / $1300 = 23.077%). This is how they come up with the 23% figure but, as anyone familiar with sales taxes would tell you, it is a 30% tax. Just one of the many little things the proponents of the Fairtax really don't want people to know.

Economists whom have looked at the Fairtax have concluded that people making over $200,000 per year would pay less under the Fairtax and everyone else would pay more.

Just calling it "Fair" does not make it so.


Judy1
NO! And yes, I've looked through the fairtax.org website, and read N. Boortz's book. And the prebate isn't, by the way, based on the cost of the "basic necessities of life" (can you imagine just who would get to decide what those are, and how that would be decided?) - it's based on the dollar amount for poverty level.

I'd probably pay less under this plan than I do today. My kids, working parents, would pay considerably more.

The working poor would pay much more - sure, they'd get the prebate, but would lose credits like EIC and Additional Child Tax Credit. Much of the middle class would pay more. The rich would get a real nice break. And they call that "fair?"


v b
Rating
This is just as complicated as filing a 1040A. It won't get rid of the IRS, won't change congress' behavoir of spend, spend, spend and will leave a cottage industry to collect those "rebates."

It will be unfair to the middle class. The middle class will get hit with the full 23% sales tax (in addition to state and local taxes) and will lose the tax exempt benefits of Roth IRAs and municipal bonds.


 Enter Your Message or Comment


User Name:  
User Email:   
Post a comment:







Archive: Forum -Forum -Finance - Links - 1 - 2 - RSS - All RSS Feeds
The Causes and the Results. 0.014
Copyright (c) 2011 Financial Crisis Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - Terms of use - Privacy Policy